St Patrick's Mental Health Services Logo St Patrick's Mental Health Services Retina Logo
Menu
  • Home
  • Introduction
  • Accessibility
  • Clinical Governance
  • Clinical Outcomes
  • Measure of Service User Satisfaction
  • Conclusions
  • References
ACT Outcome Measures SPMHS 2017-06-11T20:38:19+00:00

ACT Outcome Measures

The following programme measures were used:

  • Acceptance & Action Questionaire II

The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ II: Bond et al., 2011) is a 10 item measure of experiential avoidance or the tendency to avoid unwanted internal experiences – the opposite of which is psychological flexibility. Service users are asked to rate statements on a seven point likert scale from 1 “Never True” to 7 “Always true”. Scores range from 1 to 70 with higher scores indicating greater psychological flexibility/less experiential avoidance. The AAQ II has good validity, reliability (Cronbach’s alpha is .84 (.78 – .88)), and 3- and 12-month test-retest reliability (.81 and .79, respectively) (Bond et al., 2011).

  • Behavioural Activation for Depression Scale

The Behavioural Activation for Depression Scale (BADS: Kanter, Mulick, Busch, Berlin & Martell, 2007) measures behaviours hypothesized to underlie depression and examines changes in: activation, avoidance/rumination, work/school impairment, and social impairment. The BADS consists of 25 questions; each rated on a seven point scale from 0 “not at all” to 6 “completely”. Scores range from 0 to 150 with higher scores representing increased behavioural activation. Mean scores for a non-clinical sample of undergraduate students were 110.51 (SD = 21.04) (Kanter et al., 2007) and for a community sample with elevated depressive symptoms the mean was 69.83 (SD =20.15) (Kanter, Rusch, Busch & Sedivy, 2009). The measure has good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α ranging from .76 – .87), adequate test-retest reliability (Cronbach’s α ranging from .60 – .76), and good construct and predictive validity (Kanter et al., 2007).

  • Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire

The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) (Baer, Smith, Hopkins, Krietmeyer & Toney, 2006) assesses the tendency to be mindful in daily life, including five particular facets of mindfulness: observing, describing, acting with awareness, non-reactivity- to inner experience, and non-judging of inner experience. The measure consists of 39 items which are responded to on a 5-point rating scale ranging from 1 “never or very rarely true” to 5 “very often or always true”. Scores range from 39 to 195 with higher scores suggesting higher levels of mindfulness. In a study of non-clinical samples participants who regularly practice mindfulness had a mean of 154.2 (SD = 17.5) while those who did not practice mindfulness had a mean of 138.9 (SD = 19.2) (Lykins & Baer, 2009). The measure evidences good reliability (alpha co-efficient ranging from .72 to .92 for each facet) (Baer et al., 2006). Evidence for construct validity comes from analysis of data from samples with mindfulness meditation and no mindfulness meditation experience (Baer et al., 2006).

  • Work and Social Adjustment Scale

The Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) is a simple 5-item patient self-report measure, which assesses the impact of a person’s mental health difficulties on their ability to function in terms of work, home management, social leisure, private leisure and personal or family relationships. Participants are asked to rate impairment in each domain on a 9-point Likert scale from 0 “Not at all” to 8 “Very severely”. Total scores for the measure can range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater impairment in functioning. In a study including participants with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder or Depression the scale developers report that “A WSAS score above 20 appears to suggest moderately severe or worse psychopathology. Scores between 10 and 20 are associated with significant functional impairment but less severe clinical symptomatology. Scores below 10 appear to be associated with sub-clinical populations (p. 463, Mundt, Marks, Shear & Greist, 2002). The WSAS is used for all patients with depression or anxiety as well as phobic disorders and has shown good validity and reliability (Mundt, Marks, Shear & Greist, 2002). The scores on the WSAS have been shown to be sensitive to patient differences in disorder severity and treatment-related change.

  • The Self-Compassion Scale

The Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) is a twenty-six item self-report scale, which was designed to assess an individual’s levels of self-compassion (Neff, 2003). Self-compassion is measured through six domains; Self-Kindness, Self-Judgement, Humanity, Isolation, Mindfulness and identification or “Over-Identification” with thoughts. Each item is rated on a 5 point Likert scale, from 1 Almost Never to 5 Almost Always.

  • Clinical Outcomes
  • Important Considerations for Interpretation of Outcomes
  • Clinical Global Impression and Children’s Global Impression Scales: Outcomes for Inpatient Care 2016
    • Objective
    • Sample Description
    • Breakdown of Baseline and Final Assessment Scale Scores
    • Audit on Completion Rates of Baseline and Final CGI Scores
    • Summary of Findings
  • Acceptance & Commitment Therapy Programme
    • Descriptors
    • ACT Outcome Measures
    • Results
    • Summary
  • Alcohol and Chemical Dependency Programme Outcome Measures
    • Leeds Dependency Questionnaire (LDQ)
    • Descriptors
    • Results
    • Summary
  • Anxiety Disorders Programme
    • Anxiety Programme Outcome Measures
    • Descriptors
    • Level 1 Results
    • Level 2 Results
    • Summary
  • Compassion Focused Therapy
    • Compassion Focused Therapy Outcome Measures
    • Descriptors
    • Results
    • Summary
  • Depression Recovery Programme
    • Depression Recovery Programme Outcome Measures
    • Descriptors
    • Results
    • Summary
  • Dual Diagnosis Programme
    • Dual Diagnosis Outcome Measures
    • Descriptors
    • Results
    • Summary
  • Living Through Distress Programme
    • Living Through Distress Programme Outcome Measures
    • Descriptors
    • Results
    • Summary
  • Living Through Psychosis Programme
    • Living Through Psychosis Programme Outcome Measures
    • Descriptors
    • Results
    • Summary
  • Mindfulness Programme
    • Mindfulness Programme Outcome Measures
    • Descriptors
    • Results
    • Summary
  • Radical Openness Programme
    • Radical Openness Programme Outcome Measures
    • Descriptors
    • Results
    • Summary
  • Psychosis Recovery Programme
    • Psychosis Programme Outcome Measures
    • Descriptors
    • Results
    • Summary
  • Recovery Programme
    • Recovery Programme Outcome Measures
    • Descriptors
    • Results
    • Summary
  • Willow Grove Outcome Measures
    • Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA)
    • Descriptors
    • Results
    • Summary
  • Sage Older Adults Psychology Skills Group
    • Sage Outcome Measures
    • Descriptors
    • Results
    • Summary
Copyright 2017 SPMHS | All Rights Reserved | Website by Webaria