Results
Five Fact Mindfulness Scale (FFMQ)
An examination of the combined data from across both sites revealed a significant increase in total scores on the FFMQ from pre intervention (M=108.03; SD=21.11) to post intervention (M=129; SD=18.07). A t-test revealed a statistically significant increase in FFMQ total scores following participation in the programme, t (57) = 7.61, p<.005, with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.06). These results suggest that, on average, service users who completed the outcome measure showed an increase in their tendency to be mindful in daily life.
Graph: Five Facet Mindfulness Scale Total Scores
Statistically significant increases were reported on all subscales, with large effect sizes for the “observing” (Cohen’s d =0.86) and “non-reactivity to inner experience” domains (Cohen’s d = 0.95). Medium effect sizes were reported on “acting with awareness” (Cohen’s d =0.65), and “non-judgement of inner experience” (Cohen’s d = 0.57). A low effect size was reported for the “describing” domain (Cohen’s d = 0.41).
Table: FFMQ Mean scores by subscales, t values and effect size
FFMQ | Pre Mean (SD) | Post Mean (SD) | t | df | P value | Cohen’s d |
Observe | 23.69 (6.42) | 28.51 (4.53) | 6.31 | 66 | .001 | 0.86 |
Describe | 25.35 (6.57) | 27.86 (5.33) | 3.66 | 64 | .001 | 0.41 |
Awareness | 20.18 (5.89) | 23.76 (5.11) | 5.65 | 67 | .001 | 0.65 |
Non-Judgement | 21.15 (7.05) | 25.97 (5.41) | 5.80 | 65 | .001 | 0.57 |
Non- Reactivity | 17.83 (4.27) | 21.73 (3.94) | 6.99 | 62 | .001 | 0.95 |